Comments on: Judge: Christian beliefs have no legal standing. Evangelicals call it persecution

By: @mygodlesslife

@mygodlesslife — Wed, 27 Oct 2010 03:44:10 +0000

"Judges don’t understand that for a Christian, being free doesn’t simply mean being free to think like a Christian. It means that when a Christian goes to work they need to act like a Christian and work like a Christian."

Then don't take jobs that are in direct opposition to the faith you hold so dearly. Let those who can do the job do it. Thankfully, this is not rocket science.

By: JennyD

JennyD — Wed, 05 May 2010 23:14:51 +0000

No, it's "oppression" not to allow this guy to refuse to do the job he voluntarily applied for and was hired to do. Not permitting insubordination is "oppression"!

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 05 May 2010 18:45:06 +0000

So it's "oppression" to not allow this guy to oppress others?

By: andy

andy — Wed, 05 May 2010 18:00:33 +0000

Is it acceptable for someone to refuse to treat blacks, jews or women for religious reasons? Do you see where I'm going with this?

Where should we stop with religous tolerance? Some religions advocate human sacrifice – should we stop them from carrying that out, but allow some other religion to discriminate against gays?

By: JennyD

JennyD — Wed, 05 May 2010 16:14:51 +0000

No, it's "oppression" not to allow this guy to refuse to do the job he voluntarily applied for and was hired to do. Not permitting insubordination is "oppression"!

By: Slater

Slater — Wed, 05 May 2010 15:53:13 +0000

Hey, hold on there… I objectively like beets, so you're not allowed to dislike them!

By: Jeff

Jeff — Wed, 05 May 2010 11:45:06 +0000

So it's "oppression" to not allow this guy to oppress others?

By: Slater

Slater — Wed, 05 May 2010 08:53:13 +0000

Hey, hold on there… I objectively like beets, so you're not allowed to dislike them!