I precisely wanted to appreciate you once again. I’m not certain the things that I might have followed without the actual techniques discussed by you over such concern. Previously it was a real frightful matter in my circumstances, nevertheless being …

I just find it so confusing why people would work so hard to ensure these lives come to fruition, but then seem to leave them to their own designs once they get here…

I think it'd be much better for us to work toward establishing solid frameworks to support these people. We need to work for the happiness of the already-living (my vision of pro-life) and then we can worry about forcing people to have babies (which is what this almost is).

So, please, challenge these people to own up to their identification. Do not let the pro-lifers eat meat or support our troops. Or do not accept their spun-up-words.

I am pro-quality-life. Forcing life to appear in this world at the cost of the already-living does not add up to quality in my book.

I wonder if these "Christians" (who are by the way,CINO [christians in name only]… they are such because they are casting judgement) are being driven by the fear that Jesus could be [have been] aborted? I've never heard such a theory. Only that they are concerned that each life have the opportunity to gain entry to the gates of heaven.

Nevertheless, I'm confident these same Christians already missed the second-coming-boat. Yeah, it happened last century in Ethiopia. Sorry.

Thor carries a hammer. Jesus was nailed to a cross. Think about it.

Easy for you to say since none of these things have ever (and probably won’t) happen to you. Also, you’re a man; you don’t get a vote.

Is that what you’re saying? That God is all-powerful, but can’t stop an abortionist from terminating a pregnancy?

As far as parents deciding then a live is worthwhile based on disease, life-long care, and other issues, you should read the story of Beethoven. Virtually everyone hearing the story of the circumstances of his mother’s pregnancy would have chosen to abort Beethoven under the circumstances described, using the kind of criteria generally described as “quality of life.” We simply do not get to play God in these areas and decide who lives and who dies.

As far as the mother having the “right” to do whatever she chooses with her own body. Even if that is granted, it is a medical fact that the unborn child is a SEPARATE BODY. If the unborn child were no different then fingernails or other appendages of the mother’s body, she could decide what to cut off and what to keep. But the unborn baby, while nourished and protected by the mother’s body, is NOT the same body as hers. This is proved by the fact that the baby could have a different blood type from the mother. Nutrients pass thru the placenta from one body to the other.

Laws are passed to protect eagles’ eggs, but the unborn human baby is not considered a human being the way an eagle’s egg is considered an eagle. Is that not interesting.

Medical texts exist on how to treat the baby in the womb. You cannot have the unborn baby as a patient and as a victim of deliberate murder at the same time.

Abortion is technically the accidental or normal expulsion of an unborn baby prior to its full term. The correct term for DELIBERATE termination of an unborn baby is ABORTICIDE. It is obvious why pro-abortion people do not want to call it by the correct term: aborticide. Clearly that places it together with other “icides” like homicide, paricide, regicide, genicide, etc.

When a mother wants to keep the child, she calls it a baby, even when it is in her womb. When she does not want to keep the child, it is a fetus, or a product of pregnancy. Dehumanizing terminology has always been used to justify elimination or termination of other human lives, whether slaves, Jews, indians, or unborn babies.

There is absolutely no question that from the point of conception, this a new human life, that if not interrupted or terminated or killed or murdered, will grow into another person. The comments preceeding this poll expressed concern that there would be uncounted children requiring life-long care as wards of the state. Clearly, there is no question that these are human beings, and the only question is at what age is it acceptable to terminate their lives.

Bottom line: Either the Creator God is in control of when life is given and when life is taken, OR man plays God to decide who lives and who dies at any given time. In other words, either life is sacred and submitted to our Creator God, or life is judged for its “quality” by fallible humans (whether for good motivations or evil matters little once that criterion has been accepted).

Which kind of society do you want to live in?