Poll – Evangelicals Support Torture
Religion & Culture Thursday, April 30th, 2009In a newly-released poll, the attitudes of churchgoers and non-churchgoers toward torture of prisoners are contrasted.
The recent Pew Research Center poll studied 742 Americans. Of these were separated out “white evangelicals”, “white mainstream Protestants”, “white Catholics”, and “religiously unaffiliated”.
They were asked how often they attend services, and then asked, “Do you think the use of torture against suspected terrorists in order to gain important information can often be justified, sometimes be justified, rarely be justified, or never be justified?” Torture was not defined, but may be understood from recent news reports to include pouring water onto their faces, making them stand still, and dressing them in itchy wool sweaters. Basically, making them uncomfortable.
Of those who attend services seldom or never, only 42% thought making terrorists uncomfortable was often or sometimes justified! 40% of the “unaffiliated” group shared this position.
In contrast, 6 out of 10 white evangelicals believe that torture is a good idea. Why do you suppose there’s a difference?
Is it because evangelicals assume guilt sooner? Is it because the non-religious are more likely to understand that torture often produces little or no valuable intelligence data? Or is it something else?
Related articles:
- Christians Vandalize MSNBC Poll
- Poll – Scott Roeder: Christian Hero, or Murderer?
- Poll: 43% of Americans neutral or anti-Nat'l Day of Prayer
- AFA Poll: Why is it impossible to be gay and Christian?
- Young evangelicals are greener… but no more liberal
You can follow comments on this article through the RSS Comment Feed. You can leave a response or trackback to this entry.









[...] favorite. Avoid church? 58% of you support the rights of terrorists over Americans. Somehow, I wouldn’t be overjoyed at finally being in the majority of your fellow [...]
The question is about suspects, not convicts. I see one group taking that into account, and the other making no distinction. (Not to mention that even intellegence organizations admit that it is counterproductive.)